United States v. Birchem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summary judgment not premature based on need for additional discovery where party did not seek delayed ruling or file affidavit under Rule 56(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-05-16· cited 2×
• United States v. Lowe
  S.D. Iowa· 2009-09-01

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 1,416×
• Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope
  Supreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 906×
• Gerald L. ALLEN, Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 72×
• United States v. Warren B. Davis, Trustee of the Warren B. Davis Revocable Living Trust, and Westwood Industrial Park, Ltd.
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 25×
• United States v. James D. Ellis
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-09-01· cited 19×
• Adams v. Erwin Weller Company
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-07-01· cited 17×
• United States v. John L. Einum and Joann F. Einum
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-05-10· cited 14×
• Cassidy, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Peter Hantz, Individually, and Peter Hantz Company, a California Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1983-10-05· cited 12×
• United States v. Birchem
  D. South Dakota· 1995-04-03· cited 4×
• United States v. Dennis Birchem
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-11-14· cited 1×

Other cases named United States v. Birchem

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Birchem
  D. South Dakota· 1995-04-03· cited 4×