Gerald L. ALLEN, Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that employer’s similar treatment of other employees mitigated against finding of intolerable working conditions
• noting that supervisor’s statement that the plaintiff “could be a valuable asset to the store,” indicated that the supervisor “did not intend ... to force [the plaintiff] to resign”
• stating an objective standard by which the intolerability of employment conditions are assessed for purposes of establishing constructive discharge
• stating an objective standard by which the intolerability of employment conditions are assessed for purposes of establishing constructive discharge
• affirming the district court’s finding that plaintiff failed to support a claim of constructive discharge even though plaintiff’s request to transfer locations was denied
• affirming denial of Rule 56(f) motion because plaintiff “failed ... to demonstrate how any of this discovery would be relevant in helping him establish [the claim at issue]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).