United States v. Bifield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no substantive right on part of defendant to have U.S. Attorney’s Office follow guidelines for prosecuting money laundering cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-10-08· cited 126×
• United States v. Jordan
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-02-07· cited 5×
• United States v. Bifield
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-12-13· cited 2×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Pungitore
  Third Circuit· 1990-08-01· cited 355×
• South Dakota v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 163×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1999-03-09· cited 87×
• United States v. Merritt G. Stansfield, Jr.
  Third Circuit· 1996-12-02· cited 77×
• United States v. Thomas L. Monaco
  Third Circuit· 1994-05-10· cited 71×
• United States v. Nanci Carter Woods
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-11-05· cited 60×
• United States v. Rodney Lloyd
  Eighth Circuit· 1994-12-27· cited 45×
• United States v. Oscar Anderson, Jr.
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-06-26· cited 45×
• United States v. Kenneth Higgins
  Third Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 25×
• United States v. Merritt G. Stansfield
  Third Circuit· 1999-03-16· cited 14×
• United States v. Artim
  D. New Jersey· 1996-11-01· cited 7×
• United States v. Stansfield
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-01-11· cited 6×
• People v. Pabon
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-04-01· cited 5×
• United States v. Tally
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-01-05· cited 2×
• United States v. Loren Vancuren
  Third Circuit· 1997-03-20· cited 1×
• United States v. Stansfield
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-05-22· cited 1×