Skip to main content
First Circuit· 6/28/2000

United States v. Bierd

Citations

  • 217 F.3d 15
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15061
  • 2000 WL 815392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court’s mention of a guilty plea and acceptance of responsibility to defense counsel was not reversible error
  • “[m]ore modest deprivations can also form the 21 objective basis of a violation, but only if such deprivations are lengthy or ongoing”
  • “[m]ore modest deprivations can also form the 18 objective basis of a violation, but only if such deprivations are lengthy or ongoing”
  • no error where the remarks of the court did not take place in the context of plea negotiation discussions, but rather, in the context of a motion for severance
  • “[T]he interests of justice are best served if the judge remains aloof from all discussions preliminary to the determination of guilt or innocence so that his impartiality and objectivity shall not be open to any question or suspicion when it becomes his duty to impose sentence.”
  • no Rule 11 violation when the judge at sidebar during trial stated “why doesn’t [defendant] plead out, Civil No. 17-2331 and Criminal No. 14-225 (FAB) 9 get the three levels he’s entitled to and then that will accomplish the severance, but that’s not for me to say.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Coffin, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Bierd

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.