United States v. Vazquez-Alomar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing 8 to take judicial notice of “[t]he underlying facts relevant to the adjudication of th[e] case” 9 unless they “fit the requirements of Rule 201”
• “An award of attorneys’ fees incurred in a suit based on state 4 substantive law is generally governed by state law.”
• courts must examine the totality of the circumstances and consider “such issues as comity, judicial economy, convenience, fairness and the like”
• “At the summary judgment stage, we do not focus on the 2 admissibility of the evidence’s form. We instead focus on the admissibility of its contents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).