Fourth Circuit· 3/30/2020

United States v. Benjamin McMiller

Citations

954 F.3d 670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that assessments under § 3014(a) are “to be collected in the same manner as criminal fines”
reviewing imposition of supervised release conditions for plain error where defendant did not lodge objections to conditions in district court
determining that implicit finding of non-indigency was “adequate”
noting conditions, imposed on offender for the remainder of his life, that broadly prohibited offender who had accessed child pornography on computer from maintaining any social network account or using any electronic device capable of accessing the internet were overbroad
district court must explain imposition of special conditions so that appellate court may determine “whether they are reasonably related” to the statutory factors (internal quotation omitted)
The court “summarily order[ed] McMiller to comply with the ‘standard sex offender conditions of supervised release that have been adopted by the Court in the Western District of North Carolina.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.