United States v. Antwain Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in rejecting the categorical approach, that \Sixth Amendment concerns that compel the judicial use of the categorical approach in other contexts are not present here\
• applying the non-categorical approach to the SORNA residual clause when the defendant was convicted of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature
• finding plain error where district court imposed a life supervised release term for a § 2250(a) conviction
• applying the “circumstance-specific approach” in deciding that the defendant was subject to the registration requirement under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”)
• “SORNA establishes a comprehensive regulatory scheme to track and provide community notification regarding convicted sex offenders.”
• “[34 U.S.C. § 20911(7)(I)’s] explicit reference to the ‘conduct’ underlying a prior offense . . . indicates that Congress intended that the broader circumstance-specific analysis be applicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).