Seventh Circuit· 2/4/2008
United States v. Beaver
Citations
- 515 F.3d 730
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2419
- 2008 WL 281773
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is not uncommon for members of a price-fixing conspiracy to cheat on one another occasionally, and evidence of cheating certainly does not, by itself, prevent the government from proving a conspiracy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Evans, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. McKanryEighth Circuit· 2011-01-10· cited 84×
- United States v. IrbySeventh Circuit· 2009-03-11· cited 64×
- United States v. Van AllenSeventh Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 52×
- United States v. Maurice VaughnSeventh Circuit· 2013-07-03· cited 36×
- Ross v. American Express Co.S.D. New York· 2010-01-22· cited 31×
- United States v. DooleySeventh Circuit· 2009-08-20· cited 23×
- United States v. William P. ClarkSeventh Circuit· 2015-05-28· cited 23×
- United States v. Monica WrightSeventh Circuit· 2023-11-01· cited 13×
- CSX Corp. v. Children's Investment Fund Management (UK) LLPS.D. New York· 2008-06-11· cited 12×
- United States v. VandebrakeN.D. Iowa· 2011-02-08· cited 5×
- United States v. McCaffertyN.D. Ohio· 2011-07-14· cited 1×
- Steward Health Care Sys., LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield R.I.D. Rhode Island· 2018-04-23· cited 1×
- United States v. TuckerSeventh Circuit· 2010-04-14· cited 1×
- United States v. PulunganW.D. Wisconsin· 2008-04-29
- United States v. Van Allen, Melvin D.Seventh Circuit· 2008-04-29
- United States v. Mickey DooleySeventh Circuit· 2009-08-20
- United States v. MartinezSeventh Circuit· 2008-06-12
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 2,553×
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 1,149×
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 1,058×
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncThird Circuit· 1980-11-03· cited 334×
- Texaco Inc. v. DagherSupreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 271×
- Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-01-26· cited 254×
- United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesSeventh Circuit· 2005-05-04· cited 206×
- United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriSeventh Circuit· 1996-02-02· cited 202×
- In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of a & W Bottling, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2002-08-05· cited 192×
- United States v. Nicholas Tyrone MooreSeventh Circuit· 1997-07-16· cited 150×
- United States v. Jerry WhaleySeventh Circuit· 1987-10-06· cited 144×
- Crestview Village Apartments v. United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentSeventh Circuit· 2004-09-02· cited 120×
- United States v. Richard O'HaraSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-20· cited 116×
- United States v. BrodieSeventh Circuit· 2007-10-19· cited 113×
- United States v. Joseph F. Agostino, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1997-12-22· cited 98×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael D. Andreas and Terrance S. Wilson, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesSeventh Circuit· 2000-07-27· cited 97×
- United States v. Shane BuchmeierSeventh Circuit· 2001-06-26· cited 97×
- United States v. Deborah Johnson-Dix, Carlos Meyers, Darrell Walton, Carl A. Dawson, Jr., and Garrett ThompsonSeventh Circuit· 1995-05-23· cited 80×
- United States v. Daniel Groves, Sr.Seventh Circuit· 2006-11-22· cited 77×
Other cases named United States v. Beaver
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.