Skip to main content
· 5/16/1996

United States v. Bayless

Citations

  • 926 F. Supp. 405
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6687
  • 1996 WL 263024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even where recusal not required, reassignment may be appropriate where “avoidable problems and attendant delay” may be obviated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.