United States v. Carol Bayless

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that the Seventh Circuit has rejected “a rule requiring the government . . . to proffer a justification for its failure to present the relevant evidence at the original suppression hearing”
• finding reputation of area for drug activity, in part, provided reasonable suspicion justifying stop
• noting out-of-state license provided, in part, justification for investigatory stop under Terry
• recog nizing that “specific and articulable” showing is lower than probable cause standard required for search warrant
• \We conclude that the abuse of discretion standard accurately reflects the degree of deference properly accorded a district court's decisions regarding evidentiary matters and the general conduct of trials[.]\
• interests of justice not served by recusal where it is not otherwise required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).