Second Circuit· 5/17/2012
United States v. Batista
Citations
- 684 F.3d 333
- 2012 WL 2477694
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- underscoring that “because we presume that a jury follows the instructions of the court, the burden is even higher” for a mistrial where the court “promptly provided the jury with curative instructions”
- “A defendant alleging prosecutorial misconduct ordinarily bears ‘a heavy burden.’” (quoting United States v. Locascio, 6 F.3d 924, 945 (2d Cir. 1993)), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 1196 (2013
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cabranes, Kearse, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Mark ZabielskiThird Circuit· 2013-04-03· cited 58×
- United States v. Oniel McKenzieSecond Circuit· 2021-09-09· cited 24×
- United States v. Adalberto Murguia-RodriguezNinth Circuit· 2016-03-01· cited 19×
- United States v. WynnSecond Circuit· 2022-06-15· cited 7×
- United States v. KupaE.D. New York· 2013-10-09· cited 6×
- United States v. CaballeroS.D. New York· 2015-02-24· cited 1×
- United States v. WilsonE.D. New York· 2013-09-04· cited 1×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 2,251×
- United States v. CaveraSecond Circuit· 2008-12-04· cited 1,656×
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-02· cited 1,039×
- United States v. FernandezSecond Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 907×
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-08· cited 848×
- United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiSecond Circuit· 1993-10-08· cited 495×
- United States v. JonesSecond Circuit· 2008-06-24· cited 294×
- United States v. DiazSecond Circuit· 1999-05-04· cited 292×
- United States v. JassSecond Circuit· 2009-06-16· cited 231×
- United States v. Kon Yu-Leung, Also Known as Johnny Kon, John RuotoloSecond Circuit· 1995-04-07· cited 215×
- United States v. Thomas Zichettello, Frank Richardone, Ronald Reale, Richard Hartman, James J. Lysaght, and Peter KramerSecond Circuit· 2000-03-30· cited 183×
- United States v. ChavezSecond Circuit· 2008-12-08· cited 162×
- United States v. James PanebiancoSecond Circuit· 1976-10-14· cited 156×
- United States v. David StevensSecond Circuit· 1993-02-11· cited 152×
Other cases named United States v. Batista
16 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. BatistaE.D. New York· 2010-08-09· cited 3×
- United States v. BatistaS.D. New York· 2001-04-10· cited 2×
- United States v. BatistaFirst Circuit· 2022-04-25· cited 1×
- United States v. BatistaD. Massachusetts· 1986-12-23· cited 1×
- United States v. BatistaSecond Circuit· 1976-03-22
- United States v. BatistaEleventh Circuit· 1983-05-05
- United States v. BatistaSecond Circuit· 1986-02-21
- United States v. BatistaEleventh Circuit· 1987-05-12
- United States v. BatistaSecond Circuit· 1988-04-15
- United States v. BatistaFifth Circuit· 1992-08-12
- United States v. BatistaSecond Circuit· 1994-07-15
- United States v. BatistaEleventh Circuit· 1996-06-17
- United States v. BatistaSecond Circuit· 2012-06-29
- United States v. BatistaThird Circuit· 2007-04-25
- United States v. BatistaNinth Circuit· 2002-12-09
- United States v. BATISTANavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2021-11-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.