United States Court of Military Appeals· 1/27/1986
United States v. Bailey
Citations
- 21 M.J. 244
- 1986 CMA LEXIS 19306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- guilty plea improvident and entrapment defense raised where appellant gained profit from illegal distribution
- guilty plea improvident and entrapment defense raised where appellant gained profit from illegal distribution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Everett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-05-02· cited 44×
- United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-05-11· cited 19×
- United States v. MeyersU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1986-03-26· cited 4×
- United States v. EckhoffU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1987-02-27· cited 1×
- United States v. JursnickU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1987-03-03· cited 1×
- United States v. RollinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1989-05-04
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
- United States v. Michael Gibson NorthNinth Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 67×
- United States v. VanzandtUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-12-20· cited 61×
- United States v. Paul HillThird Circuit· 1981-09-25· cited 60×
- United States v. KastnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-12-05· cited 23×
- United States v. HillE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-12-26· cited 10×
- United States v. Ralph BrownSecond Circuit· 1976-11-08· cited 6×
- United States v. BaileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1984-04-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.