United States v. Michael Gibson North

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court properly exercised its discretion in instructing the jury that “undercover activity may take many forms including persuasion, fraudulent representations, threats, coercive tactics, harassment, promises of reward or pleas based on need, sympathy or friendship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).