United States v. Ayers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff was not a catalyst, not that the catalyst theory did not apply
• holding plaintiff was not a catalyst, not that the catalyst theory did not apply
• treating “substantially prevail” language in Freedom of Information Act as functional equivalent of “prevailing party” language found in other statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners v. Gene Giggleman, DVM
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-08-22· cited 58×
• Transverse v. IA Wireless Srv
  Fifth Circuit· 2021-03-23· cited 17×
• Troy E. Nehls, Sheriff, and Fort Bend County, Texas v. Hartman Newspapers, LP D/B/A Fort Bend Herald and Texas Coaster
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-04-27· cited 16×
• Ohio Valley Envtl. Coal., Inc. v. Wheeler
  U.S. District Court· 2019-06-04· cited 1×
• Max Hudson v. the Honorable Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas And Region 16 Education Services Center
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-02-23
• State v. Jennifer Brewer
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2011-01-21
• Dallas Morning News, Inc. v. City of Arlington
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2011-01-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• United States v. Cantwell
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-11-20· cited 631×