Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/11/2000

United States v. Ayers

Citations

54 M.J. 85
2000 CAAF LEXIS 992
2000 WL 1283089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding the appellant waived authentication issue for not raising the issue at trial
“[T]he appearance of unlawful command influence is as devastating to the military justice system as the actual manipulation of any given trial.”
“[T]he appearance of unlawful command influence is as devastating to the military justice system as the actual manipulation of any given trial.”
“An official document . . . is entitled to a presumption of regularity if it appears regular on its face.”
when an accused is charged with violation of a general order, the actual order is an adjudicative fact of consequence and may be judicially noticed
“An official document, such as the regulation at issue in this case, is entitled to a presumption of regularity [at trial] if it appears regular on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gierke, Crawford, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Ayers

30 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.