United States v. Aslan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defend- ant “waived any objections to the reliability of the [evidence]” because he “affirmatively rel[ied] on [the evidence] himself” to present alternative arguments
• finding no plain error in an instruction that did not limit the jury’s con‐ sideration to net profits, in a concealment case
• denying credit where “time in state custody was not as a result of the offense for which the federal sentence was imposed,” and noting that “no federal charges were even filed until after [petitioner] was released from state custody”
• “All of the time that Aslan spent in state custody was credited toward his state sentence and he is therefore ineligible for any Section 3585 credit.”
• “[p]rocedural er‐ rors include, among other things, failing to calculate or in‐ correctly calculating the guidelines range, treating the guide‐ lines as mandatory, failing to consider the § 3553(a
• where a defendant seeks to overturn a verdict for insufficiency of the evidence but did not challenge his conviction for money laundering in the district court and did not object to the jury instructions on this count, we review the conviction for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).