Skip to main content
· 5/8/2002

United States v. Robert Schuh, Lisa Nolen, and Curtis Lane

Citations

  • 289 F.3d 968
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8790
  • 2002 WL 924129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the issue on appeal would be frivolous when reviewed for plain error
  • determining that the issue on appeal would be frivolous when reviewed for plain error
  • explaining that substantial compliance with Rule 11 ensures that guilty plea is voluntary
  • concluding issue on appeal would be frivolous when reviewed for plain error
  • “[A]iding and abetting is merely a theory of liability, not a substantive offense, and need not be charged in the indictment.”
  • applying, in an Anders case, different standards to different possible claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Manion, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.