United States v. Arthur C. Kellogg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the right of allocution is not violated when the district court interrupted a defendant who had just been convicted of tax fraud who spoke of \giant loopholes\ in the tax law, the national debt problem, and the fall of Eastern Europe
• “Although the defendant has a right of allocution at sentencing, that right is not unlimited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).