United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in an apartment where he was free to come and go and had independent access, stored items, and joint control
• holding that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in an apartment where he was free to come and go and had independent access, stored items, and joint control
• holding that a party had a Fourth Amendment interest because he both stored items in a safe and paid part of the rent for the apartment in which the safe was kept
• holding that a defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the apartment where he, inter alia , had a key to it, could come and go freely, and stored items in it
• holding that “police must have reasonable suspicion, that an item to be searched is owned, controlled, or possessed by probationer, in order for the item to fall within the permissible bounds of a probation search.”
• stating that \[t]he permissible bounds of a probation search are governed by a reasonable suspicion standard\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).