Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/9/2019

United States v. Antonyo Reece

Citations

  • 938 F.3d 630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Davis “announced a new rule of constitutional law retroactively applicable on a first habeas petition”
  • holding that the rule announced in Davis applies retroactively
  • finding that Davis announced new rule of constitutional law retroactively applicable to § 2255 motion
  • finding that Davis announced new rule of constitutional law retroactively applicable on a first § 2255 petition
  • finding that Davis announced a new rule of constitutional law retroactively applicable on a first § 2255 motion
  • observing that “the rule announced in Davis meets the standard for a new substantive rule,” because the United States Supreme Court held “that § 924(c)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Antonyo Reece

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.