United States v. Anthony Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that the Fourth Amendment allowed an investigatory stop when the 911 caller’s description “roughly matched” the appearance of the investigated individual
• citing, inter alia, United States v. Hicks, 978 F.2d 722, 725 (D.C. Cir. 1992
• “When a defendant chooses to renew a suppression motion at or after trial, a district court is free to incorporate its past reasoning . . . or alternatively to consider evidence introduced at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Anthony Howell

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Anthony Howell
  Seventh Circuit· 2022-02-02· cited 6×
• United States v. Anthony Howell
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-05-04
• United States v. Anthony Howell
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-05-04
• United States v. Anthony Howell
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-05-04