United States v. Andrew Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judicial fact-finding of crack cocaine quantity does not violate Alleyne rule because it does not alter a mandatory minimum sentence
• holding that judicial fact-finding of crack cocaine quantity does not violate Alleyne rule because it does not alter a mandatory minimum sentence
• holding that judicial factfinding of crack cocaine quantity does not violate Alleyne rule where it does not alter mandatory minimum sentence
• “Alleyne did not extend Apprendi to facts that do not increase the prescribed statutory penalties.”
• “Alleyne did not extend Apprendi to facts that do not increase the prescribed statutory penalties.”
• “[B]oth [the co- conspirator’s] out-of-court proffer and her testimony at sentencing was detailed, consistent with earlier statements, and corroborated by other facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).