United States v. Allan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “fabricated identities, email addresses, and telephone numbers, which [the defendant] listed on forms so that any effort to verify the phony purchasers would be routed back to him” justified the sophisticated means enhancement
• approving “sophistication” enhancement where defendant created fake entities that made fictitious sales referrals to customers of a computer company
• approving “sophistication” enhancement where defendant created fake entities that made fictitious sales referrals to customers of a computer company
• upholding sophisticated-means enhancement because defendant enrolled in a company’s referral program in the names of nonexistent, fictitious entities and faxed falsified forms listing the entities as referral partners
• defendants used fictitious business entities, doc‐ tored fax headers, and fashioned phony e‐mail addresses to resemble legitimate contact information
• defendants used fictitious business entities, doc‐ tored fax headers, and fashioned phony e‐mail addresses to resemble legitimate contact information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).