United States v. Randall A. Rettenberger and Julie L. Rettenberger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that factfinder was entitled to disbelieve defendant’s disability claim given defendant’s ability to engage in substantial physical activity including skiing, whitewater rafting, and riding a motorcycle during period of alleged disability
• affirming a finding of sophisticated means where the appellant engaged in “[cjareful execution and coordination over an extended period....”
• calculating intended loss based on entire fraudulent scheme had it continued rather than the loss suffered by the date of the scheme’s discovery
• affirming a finding of sophisticated means where the appellant engaged in “[c]areful execution and coordi- nation over an extended period. . . .”
• finding sophistication where defendant fooled “a skilled neurolo- gist and 14 insurers”
• defendants sub‐ mitted falsified documents to insurers and the federal gov‐ ernment to obtain disability benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).