· 8/17/1981
United States v. Albert L. Johnson
Citations
- 658 F.2d 1176
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18448
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court’s examination of material submitted in camera did not require recusal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Bauer, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.