United States v. Larry D. Cameron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not deprive the appellant of his right to confrontation because “nothing in the excluded evidence suggest[ed] that [the witness] had any motive to lie or any bias against the defendant”
• “There is considerable danger that evidence that a witness has used illegal drugs may prejudice the jury to an extent that it will discount the witness’s testimony.”
• permitting trial court restriction on cross-examination concerning witness's character

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).