First Circuit· 1/8/1988
United States v. Alan Peter Quin
Citations
- 836 F.2d 654
- 103 A.L.R. Fed. 855
- 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 189
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 98
- 1988 WL 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deportation risk in the context of guilty plea is generally regarded as a collateral conseguence only, that is, legally irrelevant
- '[D]eportation in this context is generally regarded as a collateral consequence.'
- deportation generally regarded as collateral consequence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Aldrich, Lagueux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. GonzalezFirst Circuit· 2000-01-25· cited 117×
- Chaidez v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 97×
- United States v. Sabino Del RosarioD.C. Circuit· 1990-04-24· cited 92×
- Abdel-Karim A. El-Nobani v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2002-04-04· cited 75×
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1994-03-28· cited 64×
- CBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1992-07-01· cited 64×
- Sampson v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2013-07-25· cited 37×
- United States v. Mora-GomezE.D. Virginia· 1995-02-15· cited 28×
- State v. AquinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-07· cited 16×
- Henry Anderson v. Robert H. Butler, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1989-10-19· cited 10×
- United States v. Panzardi-AlvarezD. Puerto Rico· 1988-01-28· cited 7×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 7×
- State v. DENISYUKCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-29· cited 6×
- Rumpel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-09-27· cited 5×
- Reckmeyer v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 1989-04-05· cited 4×
- United States v. PeytonDistrict of Columbia· 1995-07-11· cited 4×
- United States Ex Rel. Potts v. ChransN.D. Illinois· 1988-11-30· cited 3×
- United States v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia· 1995-07-28· cited 2×
- Groccia v. RenoD. Massachusetts· 2000-03-24· cited 2×
- Dung Anh Tran v. United StatesD. Puerto Rico· 1999-03-31· cited 2×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. FradySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,591×
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisNinth Circuit· 1986-10-09· cited 315×
- Schlanger v. SeamansSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 214×
- United States v. Monica Joyce CampbellEleventh Circuit· 1985-12-23· cited 152×
- Douglas Fruchtman v. Frank Kenton, WardenNinth Circuit· 1976-04-09· cited 118×
- United States v. Paul A. RussellD.C. Circuit· 1982-08-31· cited 102×
- Barbara C. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ALLYN & BACON, INC., Defendant, AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1984-03-29· cited 94×
- United States v. Amadeo Augusto Luciano SantelisesSecond Circuit· 1975-01-09· cited 74×
- United States v. Gil Ricardo GavilanFifth Circuit· 1985-05-28· cited 67×
- Billy R. Dillard v. Frank Blackburn, Warden Louisiana State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1986-01-15· cited 61×
- Hector Bienvenido Nunez Cordero v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1976-04-16· cited 55×
- Susan B. Kelly v. United States of America, James P. Kelly v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1986-05-02· cited 31×
- Gerald Isaac Sassoon v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1977-03-30· cited 22×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. PamphileVirgin Islands· 1985-03-18· cited 17×
- United States v. Charles F. Burke, Jr., United States of America v. Alan Peter QuinFirst Circuit· 1983-09-14· cited 13×
- Sullivan v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1961-11-01· cited 11×
- Conrad Schiebelhut v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1963-06-25· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.