E.D. Michigan· 4/10/2001
United States v. A.F.F.
Citations
- 144 F. Supp. 2d 809
- 2001 WL 456231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] motion for reconsideration is not an appropriate vehicle for raising new facts or arguments.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersSixth Circuit· 1999-06-02· cited 419×
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. World University Inc., Santa Barbara Center CorporationFirst Circuit· 1992-10-22· cited 329×
- Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1990-11-06· cited 146×
- United States v. HarrisSixth Circuit· 1999-01-26· cited 105×
- United States v. Brian N. (A Juvenile Male), United States of America v. Craig J.B. (A Juvenile Male)Tenth Circuit· 1990-04-02· cited 85×
- McConocha v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mut. of OhioN.D. Ohio· 1996-06-14· cited 84×
- United States v. Juvenile Male 1Second Circuit· 1995-02-03· cited 55×
- United States v. David H., JuvenileNinth Circuit· 1994-07-08· cited 42×
- People v. TooleMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-04-30· cited 35×
- People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-11-15· cited 17×
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe Of Chippewa Indians v. John M. EnglerSixth Circuit· 1998-06-05· cited 5×
Other cases named United States v. A.F.F.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.