Underhill v. Peabody Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the applicable standard is “‘reasoned medical judgment’” rather than “reasonable degree of medical certainty” (quoting 7 Energy West acknowledges that “20 C.F.R. § 725.455(b
• effect of \interim presumption\ is to shift burden of going forward to opposing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).