Claude R. Ansel v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• negative X-ray rereadings cannot rebut a statutory presumption that is predicated on such a reading
• Presumption invoked by plaintiff’s physician’s testimony, coupled with the lay testimony of plaintiff wife, and co-worker; see also Prokes v. Mathews, 559 F.2d 1057 (6th Cir. 1977). In accordance with § 921(c)(4), the Secretary may rebut this presumption only by establishing (1
• Presumption invoked by plaintiff's physician's testimony, coupled with the lay testimony of plaintiff wife, and co-worker; see also Prokes v. Mathews, 559 F.2d 1057 (6th Cir. 1977). 31 In accordance with § 921(c)(4), the Secretary may rebut this presumption only by establishing (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).