· 8/29/1978
Umansky v. Urquhart
Citations
- 84 Cal. App. 3d 368
- 148 Cal. Rptr. 547
- 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[pjrocess interpreted broadly [citations omitted] does include the filings of a complaint. It can mean either the original commencement of a suit or the processes issued collaterally”
- holding absolute privilege applies to abuse of process claims
- intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.