California Court of Appeal· 8/29/1978
Umansky v. Urquhart
Citations
- 84 Cal. App. 3d 368
- 148 Cal. Rptr. 547
- 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[pjrocess interpreted broadly [citations omitted] does include the filings of a complaint. It can mean either the original commencement of a suit or the processes issued collaterally”
- holding absolute privilege applies to abuse of process claims
- intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-06-17· cited 754×
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-02-26· cited 660×
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal· 1981-05-29· cited 234×
- Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-07-12· cited 178×
- Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.California Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 155×
- Brody v. MontalbanoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-12-22· cited 93×
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-28· cited 67×
- Block v. Sacramento Clinical Labs, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1982-04-30· cited 58×
- Fellows v. National Enquirer, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 56×
- Asia Investment Co. v. BorowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-06-23· cited 56×
- Padres L.P. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-01-15· cited 51×
- Franklin Mint Co. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-05-03· cited 49×
- Financial Corp. of America v. WilburnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-02-18· cited 48×
- Rosenthal v. Irell & ManellaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-08-17· cited 48×
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-10-07· cited 32×
- Drum v. Bleau, Fox & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-04-09· cited 30×
- Abraham v. Lancaster Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-01-30· cited 26×
- Richardson v. La Rancherita of La Jolla, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1979-10-25· cited 26×
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesS.D. New York· 1988-07-06· cited 21×
- Chen v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-09-15· cited 19×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 1,035×
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1963-01-24· cited 1,019×
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 507×
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court· 1972-05-10· cited 404×
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-04-10· cited 360×
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-10-30· cited 143×
- Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal· 1973-02-26· cited 105×
- Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-06-05· cited 103×
- Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-09-21· cited 83×
- Younger v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-03-29· cited 78×
- King v. Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-01-06· cited 76×
- Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.California Supreme Court· 1968-10-25· cited 67×
- Twyford v. TwyfordCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-11-05· cited 62×
- Cooper v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-08-16· cited 58×
- Tool Research & Engineering Corp. v. HenigsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-03-31· cited 52×
- Pease v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1974-04-05· cited 47×
- Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-03-12· cited 45×
- Schwalbe v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-03-12· cited 37×
- Italian Star Line, Inc. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Second Circuit· 1931-08-25· cited 33×
- Tellefsen v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-12-28· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.