Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 11/1/2001

Ullah v. $349,370.09 In U.S. Currency

Citations

  • 22 F. App'x 731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a spouse had standing to contest 16 a forfeiture action of currency because of her community property interest in that currency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.