Ninth Circuit· 11/1/2001
Ullah v. $349,370.09 In U.S. Currency
Citations
- 22 F. App'x 731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a spouse had standing to contest 16 a forfeiture action of currency because of her community property interest in that currency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1994-02-18· cited 265×
- James F. Santa Maria v. Pacific BellNinth Circuit· 2000-01-25· cited 247×
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court· 1993-02-24· cited 246×
- Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United States of America, Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1998-09-02· cited 125×
- United States v. MarolfNinth Circuit· 1999-04-12· cited 122×
- United States v. Renee Hooper Michelle Ralph, Dana M. Hooper Paul William RalphNinth Circuit· 2000-10-12· cited 66×
- Vaughn v. Teledyne, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1980-09-17· cited 35×
- Wurzl v. HollowayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-07-02· cited 34×
- Taylor Associates v. Diamant (In Re Advent Management Corp.)Ninth Circuit· 1995-02-16· cited 25×
- United States v. Real PropertyNinth Circuit· 1998-02-09· cited 22×
- Hinton v. Pacific EnterprisesNinth Circuit· 1993-09-17· cited 11×
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. DureauCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-07-31· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.