United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Lopez-Mendoza’s “body or identity” language applies to jurisdictional, not evidentiary, challenges, in the civil forfei- ture context
• observing that discrepancies in claimant’s story raised “a suspicion that [he] was\\ involved in illegal activities, but not probable cause”
• observing that discrepancies in claimant’s story raised “a suspicion that [he] was involved in illegal activities, but not probable cause”
• observing that discrepancies in claimant’s story raised “a suspicion that[he] was involved in illegal activities, but not probable cause”
• observing that discrepancies in claimant’s story raised “a suspicion that [he] was involved in illegal activities, but not probable cause”
• discussing that small sums of money are seldom sufficient, even “when accompanied by additional factors,” to establish connection to drug activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).