District of Columbia· 11/18/2011
Ufele v. United States
Citations
- 825 F. Supp. 2d 193
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133222
- 2011 WL 5830608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Padilla created a new rule that is not retroactively applicable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Royce C. Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 5,017×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 2,419×
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 870×
- Butler v. McKellarSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 557×
- United States v. DenedoSupreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 365×
- United States v. Monica Joyce CampbellEleventh Circuit· 1985-12-23· cited 152×
- United States v. OrocioThird Circuit· 2011-06-29· cited 132×
- Chaidez v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 97×
- United States v. Wilfredo Felix AyalaD.C. Circuit· 1990-01-12· cited 91×
- Unnamed caseTenth Circuit· 2004-02-17· cited 81×
- United States v. Chang HongTenth Circuit· 2011-08-30· cited 71×
- In Re: FashinaD.C. Circuit· 2007-05-11· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.