Turner v. Turner
Citations
- 79 Cal. 565
- 21 P. 959
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 773
Syllabus
<p>Promissory Note—Non-payment — Possession of Note—Presumption —Burden of Proof. —Possession of a promissory note by the payee raises a presumption of non-payment. And possession by the maker raises a presumption of payment. Hence if the allegation of non-payment be denied, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove non-payment, at least by producing the note or accounting for its non-production.</p>
Judges: Hayne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Vesel v. Polich Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1934-01-18· cited 9×
- First National Bank of Seattle v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1893-08-09· cited 9×
- Shammas v. BoyettCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-11-12· cited 5×
- Rock Island Plow Co. v. BaldersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1910-11-16· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.