Turner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no sentencing merger issue presented; there was no disposition on the DUI per se charge and thus \nothing to merge at sentencing under the rule of lenity\
• no sentencing merger issue presented; there was no disposition on the DUI per se charge and thus “nothing to merge at sentencing under the rule of lenity”
• discussing the changes in nomenclature of alcohol-related driving offenses
• explaining the change in nomenclature of alcohol-related driving offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moore v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-02· cited 21×
• In Re Matthew S.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-01· cited 11×
• Kendall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-27· cited 10×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-28· cited 7×
• Fielding v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-07-26· cited 6×
• Juan Pablo B. v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-29