Utah Supreme Court· 3/30/1994

Turner v. Nelson

Citations

872 P.2d 1021
235 Utah Adv. Rep. 32
1994 Utah LEXIS 25
1994 WL 110851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that one of the “significant purposes” of pretrial witness disclosure.rules is to provide the opposing party with the opportunity to “investigate] the witnesses] testimony” and “prepar[e] an effective cross-examination”
providing that to show “the trial court erred,” an appellant “must provide this court with a complete record of all evidence relevant to the alleged error”
providing that to show “the trial court erred,” an appellant “must provide this court with a complete record of all evidence relevant to the alleged error”
refusing to consider whether the Act requires that any individual listed on special verdict form for apportionment purposes be actual party to litigation
applying abuse of discretion standard in reviewing trial court’s refusal to allow undisclosed witness to testify (citing Utah R. Evid. 103)
upholding exclusion of undisclosed rebuttal witness called to testify to reasonably anticipated defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Stewart, Howe, Durham, Russon, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.