· 3/30/1994
Turner v. Nelson
Citations
- 872 P.2d 1021
- 235 Utah Adv. Rep. 32
- 1994 Utah LEXIS 25
- 1994 WL 110851
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that one of the “significant purposes” of pretrial witness disclosure.rules is to provide the opposing party with the opportunity to “investigate] the witnesses] testimony” and “prepar[e] an effective cross-examination”
- providing that to show “the trial court erred,” an appellant “must provide this court with a complete record of all evidence relevant to the alleged error”
- providing that to show “the trial court erred,” an appellant “must provide this court with a complete record of all evidence relevant to the alleged error”
- refusing to consider whether the Act requires that any individual listed on special verdict form for apportionment purposes be actual party to litigation
- applying abuse of discretion standard in reviewing trial court’s refusal to allow undisclosed witness to testify (citing Utah R. Evid. 103)
- upholding exclusion of undisclosed rebuttal witness called to testify to reasonably anticipated defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zimmerman, Stewart, Howe, Durham, Russon, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.