Skip to main content
· 10/18/2007

Tupelo Redevelopment Agency v. Gray Corp.

Citations

  • 972 So. 2d 495
  • 2007 WL 3025767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “[f]ailure to cite any authority in support of claims of error precludes this Court from considering the specific claim on appeal”
  • applying lodestar method to determine attorney’s fees in absence of a written contract
  • identifying the “controlling factor” for calculating attorneys’ fees as “what is reasonable”
  • “The McKee factors are strikingly similar to the factors set out in Miss. R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a).”
  • failure to cite authority in support of claims of error precludes appellate review of those claims
  • “Rule 1.5 . . . sets out several factors which the trial court should consider in determining the reasonableness of the amount of attorneys’ fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Diaz, P.J., Carlson and Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.