Skip to main content
· 8/4/2010

Warren E. Johnson Companies v. Unified Brand, Inc.

Citations

  • 735 F. Supp. 2d 1099
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78913
  • 2010 WL 3119256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the plaintiffs Minnesota Termination of Sales Representative Act claim required interpreting a contract clause defining “good cause,” the contractual choice of law provision governed what law applied to that statutory claim
  • discussing Astraea and collecting cases that have applied its holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael J. Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.