Tunica County v. Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• long-standing rule in Mississippi that jury in eminent domain case \may reject or accept any expert testimony it chooses in cases involving land valuation\
• “the trial court is vested with a gatekeeping responsibility to prevent the admission of expert testimony based on guess or conjecture”
• \the trial court is vested with a gatekeeping responsibility to prevent the admission of expert testimony based on guess or conjecture\
• “the trial court is vested with a gatekeeping responsibility to prevent the admission of expert testimony based on guess or conjecture”
• long- standing rule in Mississippi that jury in eminent domain case “may reject or accept any expert testimony it chooses in cases involving land valuation”
• “[T]he trial court is vested with a gate-keeping responsibility to prevent the admission of expert testimony based on guess or conjecture. ” (citing Miss. Transp. Comm’n v. McLemore, 863 So. 2d 31, 41 (Miss. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).