Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the test for determining the admissibility of expert witness testimony set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. , 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993
• adopting the rule stated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms. Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as modified in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), for the admissibility of expert witness testimony
• adopting the rule stated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms. Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as modified in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), as the standard for the admissibility of expert testimony
• discussing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 119 S. Ct. 1167, 143 L. Ed. 2d 238 (1999)
• “We are confident that our learned trial judges can and will properly assume the role as gatekeeper on questions of admissibility of expert testimony.”
• “[w]ithout a showing of prejudice, this prong of the balancing test cannot weigh in favor of the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).