Tullis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court properly excluded cross examination of witness’s delusions, where delusions were not contemporaneous with the events in question or affecting the witness’s ability to testify at the time of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Trainor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-16· cited 1×
• Ladd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-25
• Small v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-29

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chambers v. Mississippi
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
• Chestnut v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-01-05· cited 92×
• Hitchcock v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-02-25· cited 89×
• Strickland v. Zant
  Supreme Court· 1982-10-18· cited 68×
• Kruse v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-05· cited 66×
• Clark v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-11-21· cited 65×
• Cirack v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1967-07-05· cited 60×
• Edwards v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-09-07· cited 51×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-26· cited 33×
• Holsworth v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 32×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-05-30· cited 8×
• Fields v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-29· cited 4×
• Burkett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-17· cited 3×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-01-21· cited 3×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-02-03· cited 1×