Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 5/27/1975

Tuft v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

Citations

  • 517 F.2d 1301
  • 10 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 929
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14528
  • 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “aggrieved person must receive actual and effective notification of his right to sue”
  • “ . . . it is undisputed that Ms. Tuft relied on the Commission’s procedure and, in the absence of prejudice to the defendant, she should not be penalized for any errors or omissions of the EEOC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Clark, Lay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.