Supreme Court of Georgia· 1/25/1984
Tucker v. State
Citations
- 349 S.E.2d 172
- 252 Ga. 263
- 1984 Ga. LEXIS 589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We need not decide whether [alleged errors in polling the jury] deprived [defendant] of any right, procedural or substantive, because [defendant] imposed no objection to any aspect of the jury poll.”
- “We need not decide whether [alleged errors in polling the jury] deprived [defendant] of any right, procedural or substantive, because [defendant] imposed no objection to any aspect of the jury poll.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weltner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-06-09· cited 78×
- Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-11-18· cited 30×
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-10-02· cited 29×
- George v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-02-21· cited 19×
- Benefield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-09-13· cited 16×
- Awtrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-05-30· cited 14×
- Hanson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-10-07· cited 10×
- Cauthen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-01-07· cited 8×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-09-09· cited 7×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-09-13· cited 2×
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-09-28· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.