Tshudy v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In order for this Court to have jurisdiction over Plaintiff's enforcement action, there must have been an EEOC determination of non- compliance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Murchison v. Astrue
  D. Maryland· 2010-01-06· cited 5×
• Johnson v. Gonzales
  District of Columbia· 2006-03-01· cited 4×
• Malek v. Leavitt
  D. Maryland· 2006-07-12· cited 2×
• Yu v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2020-09-24

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
• First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 5,431×
• Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-25· cited 832×
• Woodman v. Runyon
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-12-24· cited 149×
• Kendall v. Watkins
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-07-09· cited 147×
• Jane Doe v. United States of America
  D.C. Circuit· 1987-06-19· cited 101×
• McGarry v. Board of County Commissioners
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-04-29· cited 70×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 70×
• Sands v. Runyon
  Second Circuit· 1994-07-01· cited 48×
• Janie L. Haskins v. United States Department of the Army
  Sixth Circuit· 1987-01-08· cited 43×