Woodman v. Runyon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Cases decided under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act are therefore applicable to cases brought under the ADA and vice versa, except to the extent the ADA expressly states otherwise.”
• “Cases decided under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act are . . . applicable to cases brought under the ADA and vice versa, except to the extent the ADA expressly states otherwise.”
• “The twofold purpose of the exhaustion requirement is to give notice of an alleged violation to the charged party and to give the administrative agency an opportunity to conciliate the claim in furtherance of Title VII’s goal of securing voluntary compliance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett
  Supreme Court· 2002-04-29· cited 828×
• Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-06-14· cited 381×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.R. England, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-05-03· cited 314×
• Wilkerson v. Shinseki
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-06-02· cited 309×
• Baird ex rel. Baird v. Rose
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-09-22· cited 241×
• Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & Technology
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-03-13· cited 218×
• Jeffries v. State of Kansas
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-06-17· cited 180×
• Baird v. Rose
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-10-07· cited 156×
• Powers v. MJB Acquisition Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-07-08· cited 102×
• Sanchez v. Vilsack
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-09-19· cited 85×
• Rivero v. Univ. N.M. Board of Regents
  Tenth Circuit· 2020-02-24· cited 75×
• Templeton v. Neodata Services, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-12-10· cited 72×
• Breen v. Department of Transportation
  D.C. Circuit· 2002-03-15· cited 70×
• Jones v. Needham
  Tenth Circuit· 2017-05-12· cited 70×
• Wells v. Shalala
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-09-21· cited 57×
• Rodney Harrell v. United States Postal Service
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-05-04· cited 49×
• Tia J. Horton, and Karen Brooks, Proposed Intervenor v. Jackson County Board of County Commissioners
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-09-10· cited 46×
• Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-03-13· cited 44×
• Sifre v. Department of Health
  D. Puerto Rico· 1999-03-31· cited 42×
• Norden v. Samper
  District of Columbia· 2007-08-03· cited 41×

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Southeastern Community College v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,381×
• School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. Arline
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-20· cited 1,128×
• David L. White v. York International Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-01-05· cited 725×
• Lorraine Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Chancellor John Schroeder
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-01-26· cited 482×
• Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of Dallas
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-11-02· cited 410×
• Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney General
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-04-30· cited 383×
• Kathleen Borkowski v. Valley Central School District
  Second Circuit· 1995-08-10· cited 339×
• George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. United States Postal Service
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-11-05· cited 314×
• Roland T. Ingels v. Thiokol Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-12-12· cited 249×
• Steven OUBICHON, Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION, Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1973-07-10· cited 239×
• Donald Barth v. Bruce S. Gelb, Director, United States Information Agency
  D.C. Circuit· 1993-08-27· cited 238×
• Terry J. Shiring v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
  Third Circuit· 1996-09-20· cited 228×
• Charlie Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., Gary Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-04-21· cited 216×
• Rosemarie CARR, Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General
  D.C. Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 201×
• Leroy Gilbert v. Anthony M. Frank, in His Capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
  Second Circuit· 1991-11-27· cited 198×
• Michael A. Mengine v. Marvin Runyon, Post Master General, U.S. Postal Service
  Third Circuit· 1997-06-11· cited 186×
• Bonnie Mantolete v. William G. Bolger, in His Capacity as Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-08-27· cited 185×
• Melvin Buckingham v. United States of America, United States Postal Service, and Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-07-13· cited 172×
• Odis D. Hall v. United States Postal Service Paul N. Carlin and Chester Cole
  Sixth Circuit· 1988-08-23· cited 149×
• Vicki H. Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District 1
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-12-20· cited 109×