Ninth Circuit· 7/11/1957

Tseung Chu v. Cornell

Citations

247 F.2d 929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

distinguishing Scharton and holding that tax evasion is a crime of moral turpitude because it entails fraud
distinguishing Scharton and holding that tax evasion is a crime of moral turpitude because it entails fraud
rejecting vagueness challenge to the phrase where intent to defraud was an element of crime
“the indictment is properly considered in coming to a determination whether moral turpitude is involved”
“We are not unmindful of the myriad decisions sponsoring various concepts of moral turpitude. They offer no well settled criteria.”
“[R]eckless assault coupled with an element of injury, but not serious injury, is probably not a CIMT” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Chambers, Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Tseung Chu v. Cornell

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.