Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Patent Local Rules for the Northern District of California were used as a model in the creation of the Standard Special Procedures Order ... for Cases Under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, Effective May 1, 2002.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Zoltek Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-04-12· cited 37×
• Cohen v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-08-03· cited 31×
• Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-04-30· cited 11×
• Spectrum Sciences & Software, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-02-14· cited 9×
• Accenture Global Services GmbH v. Guidewire Software Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2010-03-05· cited 8×
• Laboratory Skin Care, Inc. v. Limited Brands, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2009-10-14· cited 6×
• Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2009-04-07· cited 6×
• Canvs Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-10-25· cited 5×
• Ogunniyi v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-01-19· cited 5×
• Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-08-22· cited 4×
• Baley v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-09-29· cited 3×
• Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-01-24· cited 2×
• M.A. DeAtley Construction, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-03-30· cited 1×
• Parker v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-07-13· cited 1×
• Abbey v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-05-05
• Klamath Irrigation v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-09-29
• Lucier v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2018-07-26
• Menendez v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2018-10-30
• Peretz v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2020-12-04
• Hernandez, Kroone & Associates, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-06-16

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-08· cited 637×
• Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-03-10· cited 448×
• Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, Incorporated
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-01-30· cited 447×
• Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1990-07-06· cited 301×
• Wilson v. Bradlees of New England, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2001-05-17· cited 252×
• Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1999-07-16· cited 196×
• Klonoski v. Mahlab
  First Circuit· 1998-09-25· cited 99×
• Finley v. Marathon Oil Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-02-14· cited 99×
• Young Dental Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Q3 Special Products, Inc., and David G. Kraenzle
  Federal Circuit· 1997-06-19· cited 84×
• Anita Mason Rowland v. American General Finance, Incorporated
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-08-12· cited 63×
• Optical Disc Corporation v. Del Mar Avionics and Bruce Del Mar
  Federal Circuit· 2000-04-07· cited 57×
• Francis Gutierrez and Joseph Rydel v. At&t Broadband, LLC and Communications and Cable of Chicago, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-09-28· cited 49×
• Citizens Federal Bank v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-05-10· cited 33×
• Stelco Holding Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2000-01-13· cited 5×

Other cases named Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-03-22· cited 5×
• Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-08-22· cited 4×
• Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2006-11-13