Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding whether reconsideration is appropriate “lies largely within the discretion of the district court”
• measure of damages for temporary taking was lost rents or royalties, not lost profits or consequential damages
• “total minimum amount of rent and royalties” that plaintiff would have received under a proposed joint venture agreement
• “The usual measure of just compensation for a temporary taking . . . is the fair rental value of the property for the period of the taking.”
• “It is a well settled principle of Fifth Amendment taking law . . . that the measure of just compensation is the fair value of what was taken, and not the consequential damages the owner suffers as a result of the taking.”
• “It is a well settled principle of Fifth Amendment taking law . . . that the measure of just compensation is the fair value of what was taken, and not the consequential damages the owner suffers as a result of the taking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).